🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.